COVID-19 & diagnostics: the value of ‘test, test, test’

  • Posted on 27.08.2020

COVID-19 & diagnostics: the value of ‘test, test, test’

H Martens1

Hans Martens

Chair of the Coalition for Health, Ethics and Society (CHES), and former CEO of the European Policy Centre (EPC)

_DSC0119

Bernarda Zamora

Senior Economist at The Office of Health Economics (OHE)

shutterstock_262883918

The power of diagnostics information (VODI) to public health and society was a topic of keen interest even before the COVID-19 outbreak. The pandemic offers us fresh lessons on how health systems can harness this value. 

Many of us will recall one of the earliest recommendation from the Director General of the WHO during the pandemic: test, test, test. In our view, testing played a key role in healthcare systems’ response to COVID-19. 

From the earliest weeks of the pandemic, Germany and South Korea stood out in managing outbreaks relatively well. Besides having very resilient healthcare systems with high laboratory capacity and trained staff, they were also doing better than most countries because they had the resources to test widely at an early stage. As a consequence they have also suffered lower case fatality rates than comparable countries. 

Despite the rapid development of diagnostic tests, most countries lacked the necessary personnel, equipment, and infrastructures to be able to cover the needs caused by the surge of severe COVID-19 cases. Yet, the wide deployment of diagnostics has helped to control this surge in countries which supported appropriate reimbursement policies for diagnostics and antibody tests. 

Social measures, including the design of lockdown protocols and the progressive return to the “new normal”, have been informed by the effectiveness with which diagnostics were deployed. Border policy has been linked to the availability of, and free access to, rapid testing at airports. This has been facilitated in some high-income countries such as Denmark, and in some low- and middle-income countries, such as Senegal. 

So, how can we better harness the value of diagnostic information for more personalized care in future? The urgency of controlling the surge of COVID-19 cases has made it necessary to prioritise the immediate consequences of the tests, those defined in the VODI concept as “public health benefit: identification of notifiable disease(s) allowing to take measures to contain the spread of infection”. 

Yet, that does not fully capture the wide-ranging value of diagnostic information in tackling this pandemic. The variety of symptoms and severity of COVID-19 demonstrate VODI as an instrument for more personalised care.

In addition to COVID-19 testing, tests to detect other respiratory diseases, especially influenza, will be critical to enable differential diagnosis, and hence targeted patient management decisions. Combined diagnostic tests that allow for the detection of COVID-19 and other seasonal viruses at the same time (currently in development) will further ensure an effective response to this global health emergency in the coming months. 

Moreover, it has been found that about 22% of the global population is at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease because they suffer from other diseases, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. These conditions also benefit from advanced molecular diagnostics when it comes to disease management (e.g. medicine optimisation). For example, a case study developed by MedTech Europe highlights the role of diagnostic information to improve care plans for patients suffering from heart failure. 

From the complications caused by chronic diseases to the influence of genes in COVID-19 severity – which is currently being researched – diagnostics guide the care pathway and provide the arrays for genomics research. Nonetheless, this value is barely recognised, and consequently the use of molecular diagnostics in clinical practice is not sufficiently widespread. 

In the second part of this two-part article, we look at how to unlock the potential of diagnostic data

The comments are closed.